PopScotti Live Resin Badder Terpological Cannalysis
Biscotti XRed Pop
Popscotti is a uniquely presenting Indica Dominant Hybrid in all of its categories unter Terpological Discernment. It is a cross.of some Unique Genetics crossing a more.commonly seen Strain, Biscotti with a much less common Recreational strain, RED POP. Popscotti presents an Indica leaning profile but with a unique sativa Expression on the Profile.
In a Terpological Reading of a strain there are essentially a handful of ways in which sativa expresses characteristics of sativa in Indica leaning Genetics. However, the presentation of Indica genetics on sativa Characteristic is much less likely, While it does happen it isn't as common to see for example, a Humulene Dominant Sativa hybrid, Given that Humulene is correlated to Indica. Remember, Humulene is related to beer via Hops, whose Latin name is Humulus Lupulus. That uck shake n shiver after you take a drink of beer, or a hit of rank n raw herb, that's Humulene. This isn't as common for example, as a Terpinolene Dominance, characteristic more often than not of Sativa on an Indica Profile.
By indica vs Sativa Profile we are referring to the dominant Terpenes and cannabinoids and how they present. Sativas are defined in their Primary category of the super class of Terpenes by Terpinolene & Ocimene really over other Terpenes. The Cannabinoids characteristic is more complex for sativa expression. For one, higher THC levels indicate an increased level of sativa presenting on the indica Profile, at least that's the case with Popscotti. In Popscotti we see both the diminsihment of indica characteristic as well as inclusion of sativa leaning characteristic.
Although those sativa inclusions, in Popscotti being Ocimene at 0.14% and Terpinolene at 0.17% are positioned in a secondary level ofnthe Superclass of terpenes. Heightening that categorization to a primary level would alter the extent to which we are reading Sativas impact on the Hybridization of this profile.
We See in the ocimene and terpinolene the inclusivity of sativa in Indica expression, but remember for each there is both inclusions as well as the diminishment of the "standardized" levels and presences of Indica Leaning Terpenes and cannabinoids.
For example, linalool is not common in sativa expression at all, and it is terpologically a primary example of the Indica superclass of Terpenes. However, in Popscotti there is a very obvious lowered Linalool level. When you see Humulene at a higher secondary level and linalool near 0% given linalool and Humulene heightened presence indicates deeper indica genetic expression, we suspect the diminished level of linalool from the heightened level of potent sativa expression. In other words, one way sativa is expressing on Indica with a lowered typical indica characteristic showing at tertiary superclass Levels.
In Indicas we see a primary level of beta Caryophyllene, linalool, & Humulene,.and beta Caryophyllene is a hard defining aspect of indica Characteristic. Beta Caryophyllene enhances sedation of the cannabis. Also, Beta Caryophyllene is terpologically the most accurate descriptor of indica given it is a direct enhancement of sedation and Indica is relative to couch lock and pain relief.
Trans Caryophyllene is the most common form of Beta Caryophyllene and appears more often in indica because of this factor. However, the more hardline descriptor of indica relative to how we comprehend the difference between indica and sativa as Relaxation and sedation vs uplifted & energetic is indeed BETA Caryophyllene. That means that even in a sativa with a beta Caryophyllene presence, that indica characteristic expressesas sedative in nature. It is one of the few ways we see inclusivity of indica on a sativa leaning profile, but remember Popscotti is Indica by Industry definition.
Trans Caryophyllene being present in an indica / a lack of the beta caryophyllene is telling us that this Indica Hybrid has a lessened sedative nature as it lacks that sedation increases Terpene. On this note, people often misunderstand the presence of Myrcene as it varies relative to beta Caryophyllene presence and levels relative to one another. Myrcene enhances sedation of beta Caryophyllene when paired there with, it does.so to a lesser extent with trans Caryophyllene. Also, the probability the Myrcene will impact the absorption of THC across the blood brain barrier increasing psychoactivity is more prominent with trans Caryophyllene. It takes much more Myrcene to cause a psychoactive enhancement over sedative with beta Caryophyllene than trans Caryophyllene.
So, with that, we know that a strain we are told is indica and is heavy on primary level in a trans Caryophyllene we know the sedation will likely be turned down, atleast the initial onset of the sedation & it is more easily impacted by heightened beta Myrcene presence. With that, the likelihood of being made more psychoactive is increasing and does so more with heightening beta Myrcene levels. Myrcene with beta Caryophyllene is typically sedative more so than if we took away the Myrcene from that equation. It takes almost an exponentially higher level of Myrcene compared to Beta Caryophyllene to get a psychoactive effect overpowering the indica Characteristic sedation.
In Popscotti we have Trans Caryophyllene at 1.68% and a Myrcene level of 1.33%. This is a reasonable level of each for the Terpenes to express more in their colloquially accepted characteristics and not change the sedating quality of indica to one more psychoactive. This is the hybrid aspect. To what extent is indica diminished? Moreover, to what extent is that diminished level replaced by or taken over experientially by heightened Myrcene to Beta Caryophyllene ratios? Remember, trans Caryophyllene is the most common form of beta Caryophyllene.
This is also an area of interest to me that I believe can point to the origins of cannabis, similar to limonene being expressive of sativa overall but having a presentation for indica and sativa not just effected by undertones of earthiness. There are actually 2 enantiomers of limonene, as well as 2 forms of Limonene. I have yet to really define whether it is that dual enantiomers nature or the variation between Delta and L Limonene that differentiates this.
It may be that I don't have a full grasp on this concept yet. I was able to intuitively sense this pattern in the confirmation of Analysees and realized I wasn't just smelling things when I learned of the dual enantiomer nature of limonene as well as that delta and l limonene are described as Orange vs lemon aroma. Orange is certainly a more indica oriented aroma terpologically thinking han lemon. Lemon is sour, vibrant, saliva inducing while orange is more rank, earthy in its rind aromatic presence. I think it's a solid comparison or to compare lemon un peeled on the tree to indica, while sativa expresiveness is defined in the sliced open lemon.
Limonene is what I have referred to in my Terpological protocol as a bridge between indica and sativa. Indica landrace does have the presence of Limonene, but again that limonene is typically different than sativa Limonene, and not just from the earthy undertones that is indica which aren't limonene, like beta Caryophyllene or linalool or Humulene.
In sativa LIMONENE has the more vibrant expressive nature we expect terpologically of A sativa. Ergo, even though overall Limonene is expressive of sativa characteristic, we can't presume from heightened limonene levels that we have heightened sativa presence. Popscotti is a perfect example of this and this is a common happenstance in modern cannabis, which supports my sativa oriented protocol, IE diminished by sativa or sativa expresses on indica (occurs more Often than for example sativa diminished by indica.)
Popscotti has a dominant primary level of 2.99% which is nearly double the next highest level Terpene, trans Caryophyllene at 1.68%. The lowered level of linalool is also going to impact the limonene presence, especially how it presents aromatically. Because the reading of the profiles is only an initial step to discernment, and this is correlated with the aromatic profile and ideally to a structural profile as well, we have to consider this whole.picture. Ergo, we need to consider that the lessened presence of Indica aromatic characteristic of lavender, earthy, floral notes of linalool in how the limonene will then Present.
As well, overall Limonene experimentally is going to make the cannabis experience more.lively.and situated moreso towards sativa alertness. It is t an energetic psychoactive TERP, but it DEFINATELY also aligns experimentally with sativa characteristic. This is also represented in the Popscotti profile as it has rather odd alertness and uppidyness that we wouldnt expect from a sativa.
However, we know early on in seeing this profile that it is a sativa impacted hybrid. We can see this in quick observations of the presence of lack thereof of certain patterns. For example, seeing a significantly high THC level beyond approximately 0.5% in live concentrate examples is indicative of the sativa characteristic to present with higher levels of THC. The presence of THCVa is a quick decider as well, as it is typically present in a cannabinoid profile from sativa Landrace genetics, often times in modern cannabis from Durban Poison.
As an example in the Terpenes, while it's harder to point to one Terpene to be a final deciding factor, we can be confident by pairing Terpenes and understanding those pairs. For example, we know we're seeing sativa if we see no beta Caryophyllene, linalool, or Humulene.
Now I do realize there are obviously more Terpenes characteristic of indica than these 3, however they are the most prominent currently in my work in progress. Bisabalol is a tertiary level Terpene typically but is indica representative. Terpineol is often at tertiary or secondary levels and is also characteristic of Indica.
THEREFORE,seeing a lack of Humulene, linalool, and BETA Caryophyllene and seeing heightened to primary or secondary levels of terpinolene and/or ocimene we can be more confident in stating sativa prominence. On the same note, the presence of Trans Caryophyllene makes it more likely.that were dealing with sativa significance. However, remember trans Caryophyllene is the most common form of beta Caryophyllene,.so it best to think of this rule in terms of Beta Caryophyllene (as Beta) being relative to Indica. It effects the cb2 located throughout the body receptors influencing sedation. Even when trans Caryophyllene presents in indica it still maintains its sativa orientation therein as it at the very least is less sedating than Beta Caryophyllene &doesn't have as intense of a sedation aplification with beta Myrcene as seen with Beta Caryophyllene.
These characteristics make Trans Caryophyllene more characteristic of Sativa orientation that indica even though it is the most common form of beta Caryophyllene & therefore occurs more in both indica and sativa. Ergo, to simplify understanding this, think beta equals cb2 which are in the body where beta Caryophyllene seeks relaxation. Indica, body, cb2 receptors in the body, sedation of the body by CB 2 receptor activation via beta Caryophyllene. That sedation of beta Caryophyllene is enhanced with the presence of beta Myrcene at less than exponentially greater levels of beta Caryophyllene.
When Myrcene is much higher than beta Caryophyllene, we tend to see an increase in psychoactive nature of the experience & a lessening of traditional indica characteristics effected by the increased activity on CB1 receptors. The heightened Myrcene causes the combination one would expect to be sedating to be the opposite of sedating. This is crucial to remember about beta Myrcene because as on its own it is analgesic, and only slightly relaxing. It is moreso relaxing due to its analgesia / painkillkmg properties allowing calm. Alone or when much higher than beta Caryophyllene the pair reverts back to its CB1 receptor psychoactivity enhancement.
To support that we can look to a study where lab rats injected with Beta Myrcene both subcutaneously and intra paritaneally were shown to have analgesic benefits similar.to that of prescription opioids pain killers without activating the reward seeking pathway to that effect. Same pain killing benefit, no addictive behaviors. This speaks to the apparent lack of sedative quality of Myrcene that seems to be colloquially accepted as myrcenes main characteristic action in cannabis.
So remember, alone it's analgesic and possibly psychoactively more intense but with beta Caryophyllene it is sedating more than beta Caryophyllene alone. Myrcene increasing within the range of not causing the throw back to CB1 receptor activity tends to make the relaxation / sedation of beta Caryophyllene hit more.immedoately with more intensity, intensity being very similar to that psychoactive sensation Myrcene produces in sativa leans.
You also tend to feel the beta caryophyllene as you inhale the cannabis oil and the trans Caryophyllene tends to cause a burnt throat hit & fiery exhale. Think of trans caryophyllene as the 'cough to get off' instigator. Beta Caryophyllene kicks like a Clydesdale horse before exhale.
ONE OF THE patterns of which I am most proud for having uncovered so far in my development of this protocol is the formula for lea n assignment from Pinenes levels. This formula is approximately equivalent to the presence of indica to sativa.
The formula is
(A-Pinene÷Sum A+B) / (B-Pinene÷Sum A+B)
Approx. =
Lean Of Sativa (Alpha) to Indica (Beta)
This formula usually holds true but there are exceptions, all of which is haven't used out totally yet. However, one of those occasions of acceptance is in Popscotti. We must remember in this that the presence of sativa characteristic on this indica profile, which is important here. In the pinene formula use we find that alpha pinene seems to indicate a pure sativa landrace strain as there is no Beta Pinene listed. This would indicate a pure sativa genetic, which we know upfront from the packaging in this case that were dealing with an Indica Hybrid.
I believe this is a just barely leaning indica, so around a 55/45 Indica Dominant hybrid. I have a theory about the pinene ratios which is that strains with more pure genetics closer in their lineage to strain at hand show a lack of adhering to the Pinene formula. This applies to strains expressing themselves more purely as well as, like in Popscotti more pure strains contributing to the genetic pool closer to the production of popscotti. So instead.of seeing al landrace 4 generations back we may see.it as a parent genetics for example.
We have a significant level of Alpha Humulene in Popscottie which is one of the few solid indicators.of an indica leaning heft. Humulene appears in this Live Resin Badder at 0.82%. The further away from immediate primary level support of The primary dominant Terpene, often beta Caryophyllene in Indicas (as beta in easier to define situations or as trans Caryophyllene in less clear strains) then the less indica heft we are seeing expressed therein.
Back tracking a bit to the Cannabinoid Profile, we see a few things that stand out immediately. The first most obvious things are the increased level of THC and the presence of THCVa. Both of these factors are indicative of sativa expression being prominent in the profile. This is essentially just traditional cannabis knowledge colloquially accepted by the community. That being that THC is typically considered to be in higher levels in Sativa cannabis whereas CBD is more commonly in higher levels in Indicas.
Then we look for he expression of CBGa to CBG profile given that we already know from packaging his is Indica, though regardless this is usuallythe point at which I begin when reading profiles. The typical Indica characteristic is approximately 1.5% CBGa to an Approximately 1/3 that level of CBG, which is about 0.5-0.9% or so.
Here we have a CBG level totally diminished to being not listed, and a heightened CBGa Level from the expected indica expression. These both indicate a sativa characteristic expression on an Indica Profile. The CBGa expresses as being more.impacted hy sativa as the level increases, and the corresponding effect on CBG characteristic of this haopenstance is a lessening thereof. So both ways we see expression of one lean on Andover another & diminishment effect are both represented in this CBGa / CBG profile.
Continued on 2/16/24
The genetic breakdown of the plant is also important to get a full understanding of the strains your interpreting. I want to highlight the fact that the alpha Pinene Beta Pinene formula not only doesn't apply properly to this strain, but it is the polar opposite of the actual lean. Remember that beta pinene relative to indica and alpha to sativa that added together, each taken against the sum of the two is the ratio of indica to sativa respectively.
So if you seen alpha 0.5% and Beta pinene the same 0.5%, we have a total of 0.10%. Beta pinene over the sum is 50% as is alpha pinene as their the same in this example. This is a 50/50 lean.
However, when the strain is presenting in one of two ways, the formula equates to a polar opposite lean. Those two situations are when the genetics are as follows. The first, we see in examples of landrace presentation near the contributing genetics, aka simplicity of the genetic profile (within 3-5 generations of the landrace genetics.)
So the closer to the pure genetics that a strain is, the more likely it is that the pinene formula presents polar opposite lean moreso than the intuitive initial glancing understanding of the over all profile. So looking at this Profile we would understand it is likely indica, but heavily influenced by sativa genetics. Or in the case of this Popscotti by Gage we know it is Indica Hybrid from packaging labeling.
The Second situation, the opposite presentation is common in profiles that are expressing dominant or prominent levels of Terpenes & Cannabinoids & yheir corresponding levels opposing the presumed lean. In other words heavily oriented in opposition to the intuitive understanding or knowledge of the actual lean.
So maybe a terpinolene heavy & THC heavy indica hybrid like Snoop Dog OG, though there are more oppositional examples. A sativa example of this would be like the profile.in Blue Dream, slightly indica indicated by its beta Caryophyllene presence. Again, your much less likely to see this, pinene indicate indica on an obvious or known/suspected sativa than to see pinene indicate sativa on an indica.
So in short it is less common to see a polar opposition against sativa, where pinene formula is indicating indica on a sativa lean, than the apparent sativa lean on indicas. Again this supports the idea behind the genetic strength of sativa relative to my theory on cannabis as well as the recreational market from 1970s -mid 2000s.
On that note I find it best to not know before hand the lean of a strain so I am not influenced by it in my analysis. The other situation we see polar opposition in lean to formula is in stains that present with profiles in significant opposition to the reality of the strain. So for example, a heightened terpinolene to dominance in an Indica Hybrid like Snoop Dog OG or Gorilla Glue no 4.
We can look at the overall profile once we have a general grasp of the Terpological assignment of Terpenes and Cannabinoid interactions for ourselves, and when we see a sativa dominant Terpene expression in a generally indica profile, possibly with other opposition markers like THC potency (as opposed to lower THC, not THCa but Delta 9 THC) we can prepare for the possibility that pinene levels will be oppositionally indicative.
In this one of the two situations where I have seen this inaccuracy of pinene formulae this will prevent less absolute than simplified genetic lineages. In this instance as well we often see the pinene Formula not give us an accurate description of the strains lean, but not as an absolute opposite of landrace. But rather some obscure lean in opposition to the intuited reality or known lean from box indicators.
The difference is that when the presenting cannabis is close to the landrace genetics in its lineage, we tend to see an absolute pinene definition opposite the expected. But when the strain presents as uniquely expressing indica on a sativa or sativa on an indica we see opposition of lean but not in absolute totality of polar opposition. It may present as 55/45 sativa rather than being appropriately categorized indica.
This is a fairly common occurrence in modern Hybrid cannabis so this is an important concept to grasp to fully understand Terpological Protocol. 55/45 is the probable lean of this strain in my Terpological Discernment. So like this Popscotti, the presenting cannabis, the genetics are closer to landrace in lineage therefore it presents as an absolute polar opposite.
In Popscotti we see this defined with an absolute absence of Beta pinene in the superclass presentation in the Confirmation of Analysis.these rules naturally always have exceptions.
Ergo, the indication is a pure sativa in Popscotti. This is the common indication in simplified genetics where as in genetics indicating opposote profile presence we see a reversed lean of the pinene ratio, still in opposition to the expected
In my opinion, my hypothesis of this is that sativa genetics, particularly landrace are much stronger in stability than both Hybrids as well as Landrace Indica. Ergo you will often see this polar opposition indicated in an indica hybrid or fairly potent indica as opposed to seeing a sativa hybrid present incorrectly as indica. This also backs up and fits with my analysis of sativa genetics as the dominant or at least genetically stronger from of CANNABIS.
While it's true, indica is more hardy in terms of survivability of adverse conditions, in terms of genetic presentation expression compared to indica it often overpowers it's mating strains. Even when we see for example, A strain 4 generations down from a landrace cross of Durban Poison, that Durban Poison still is able.to express itself quite often in the indica hybrid examples of this. Often in these cases the Indica Hybrid will present with levels of THCVa, uncommon in Indica as well, or heightened THC as previously noted.
Again, the most important thing here is that when the cannabis being studied is within just a few crossings from the Landrace genetics, the pinene ratio presents as polar opposite to the actuality, meaning a total sativa lean on this (likely imo) 55/45 Indica hybrid.
So it is not opposite like 55/45 SATIVA Dom. Rather than. indica, But opposite in totality, so it's sativa pure that is the pinene indication. This is the que that the genetics are likely very simplistic, having few crosses between presenting strain and the landrace contributions.
Again, there's always exceptions, it's possible to be simplemin lineage and have an accurate pinene representation. And comparing when this happens vs when it doesn't is how I start to understand what's causing this and how it's effecting everything, or how it can be used to further understand the cannabis.
In modern cannabis in America it is not uncommon for this to be Durban Poison in these situations as it is a significant contributer to modern genetics, for example via the cookies.line of cannabis.
Biscotti is one of our halves of the genetic contribution to Popscotti. Biscotti is a cross of South Florida OG and Gelato #25 (Guava Gelato). We have here a trace back to Thin Mint GSC & Sunset Sherbet. This is what I mean by the simplicity of the profile. The more simplistic the lineage the more likely it is we see that oddity of pinene ratio representation. In absolute polar opposition, as opposed to the other happenstance situation where sativa is expressing heavily on the Indica leaning strain when the opposition is not absolute but still in opposition to the reality of the lean.
Sunset Sherbet is a well known strain and is a good example of both simplicity of genetics and the presence of Durban Poison (or possibly just South African Landrace in General ) being the genetics of this oddly presenting Indica. We have Thin Mint GSC which is a cross that takes us back to Durban Poison F1. This is within a mere 6 total crossings.
We have Hindu Kush Indica With Burma Sativa. This is an interesting area of thelineae to make more of as it is a cross of pure Indica And Pure sativa Landrace Genetics. Burma uses an unknown Indica From Burmese to cross with OG Kush. OG Kush is also not a complex genetic lineage, as it is a cross of Chem Dawg and the Landrace India Hindu Kush named after the Afhani/pakastani mountain range to which it is endemic.
This is also a key thing to make of in the genetics of Popscotti overall. Specifically the presence of Hindu Kush in the parents of Burma, as it is Burmese & OG Kush, as well as it being crossed with Hindie kush. So the Parent is present in the other parents contributing genetics one generation from the current.
We also then see in the initial genetics of Biscotti, we have South Florida OG, where we see Hindu Kush crossed with Gelato #25, which also has Hindi Kush repeating this tactic of reusing the landrace genetics after they've been used. This is also an important pattern to take note of and observe patterns occuring in relationship thereto.
When we look at them Hindu Kush x ChemDawg, OG Kush...we know that Chemdawg is likely also a croas of Landrace genetics. So here again we have a quick abrupt halting of the lineage. Chemdog is likely Nepalese x Thai Landrace, or at least this is the most accepted current consensus of its uncertain genetics. Chemdawg is merely an advanced recreationally potent improved version of chemdog, same Genetics.
Chemdawg is a version worked on by the US illicit market to amplify potency and orient the strain recreationally. Hence, high AF.
Then we move onto the genetics of Gelato 25 aka Guava Gelato and we see even more of this Hindu kush Indica being used to cross over it's genetic offshoots. Like OG kush X Burma. We have Hindu Kush x Chemdog but it is doubly present crossed with burma then crossed over itself.
oG kush crossed with the F1 Durban Poison Landrace is also here in Thin Mint Cookies.
While Red Pop does not have the genetic Simplicity that is seen in Biscotti, there is a unique presentation none the less that aligns with the strain being an example of opposition to the intuited or known strain lean. In this case there is an extensive amount of Landrace contributions to the genetics of this one hybrid strain.
Red Pop is also known as Faygo Red Pop crosses a hynrid of unknowm limeage, Strawberry with Cookoes n Cream. Cookies n cream gives us the genetics of Girl Scout Cookies and Straighter F2. Now while these direct parents are not landrace, we see landrace taking only one more step back genetically. There we have Thin Mint GSC which is OG Kush x F1 Durban.
This is a Durban Poison one generatikn removed from its endemic environment. Then we already know we have Hindu Kush in OG Kush. OG Kush is important to mention here as well since we're attempting to understand why these pinene profiles are presenting in such a unique manner. oG Kush is a Clone Only line, all of those used in the creation of Popscotti are clone Only OG derivatives. I included a chart above to compare OG genetics with those of Kush indicating the difference between them.
OG Kush is a clone only, but others included here like Tahoe OG take a Tahoe Cut and cross with san Fernando Valley OG. San Fernando Valley OG is a cross of OG kush derived from the Emerald Triangle Unknown Hybrid (compared to the Strawberry Unknown Hybrid) & Hindu Kush Landrace with Afghani Indica Landrace. So we therefore have clones of various cuttings that create carrying lines of OG cannabis. Like the contributing genetics to Popscotti via Red Pop of SFV OG & SFV OG Kush.
When we get to Starfighter F2 we start to see a lot more examples of parent strains with very simplostic and therefore genetically pure lineage. One can merely quickly pick any contributing genetics from the lineage tree for Red Pop under Starfighter F2 & Everything falls within the range making it applicable to strain lean oppositional Ratio phenomena of the pinene formula, remember of which there are two happenstances in which we see said phenomena.
Genetic Simplicity as seen here and opposition presentation in profiles. Both of these characteristics are present in Popscotti, the simplicity of the profile / proximity to landrace contribution & as well as sativa expression on this industry labeled indica hybrid. We see both Ocimene & Terpinolene present at a secondary level when taken against the entire superclass. Ocimene tests 0.14% and Terpinolene 0.17%. given the numbers on the profile these Terpenes are categorized as a secondary level Terpene.
This isn't as significant as if these were primary on an indica, like Snoop Dog OG dominance in Terpinolene. Meaning that the likelihood of the strain expressing in opposition is supported more strongly by this observation. In the case of Popscotti the proximity of the strain to landrace is more applicable than the secondary level presentation of the sativa characteristics on this obviously indica Profile.
In addition to the manner in which sativa presents on indica or vice versa (much less common, IE Blue Dream beta caryophyllene presence equals.relaxing sativa) we have to also take into account the sativa profile diminishment of Indica expression on the profile. We see this exemplified in the lessened level of linalool. Linalool is an earthy lavender like floral Terpene which is characteristic of indica expression.
Linalool is typically aligned inso far as the levels of Humulene & beta Caryophyllene. Beta Caryophyllene typically tests as your second highest and often the dominant Terpene in the superclass of Terpenes. Humulene and linalool typically act in support of this Terpene at levels sort of stair stepping down from the beta Caryophyllene level.
Lemon Kush is a great example of how Red Pop isnt characteristic of the first method in which pinene formulas' strain lean oppositional Ratio phenomena which is simplicity of the profile. This is also thought of as proximity to landrace genetics, as with less genetic crossing there's a closer proximity to landrace. Lemon Kush is exemplified by the reoccurrence of landrace contribution numerous times.
Lemon Kush is a unique example.of the phenomena as the profile is not simplistic in nature, yet it has very quick paths to landrace contributions. There is simply a significant number of landrace genetics crossing. First there is the initial cross of genetics which is Lemon G (also extensively landrace impacted close to presenting strain) with Hindu Kush Hailimg from Afghanistan.
We move to the first set of genetics and we see Early Misty x G13. G 13 is known as Government strain Number 13. It is highly rjmored to be either a genetic enhancement experiment by the US government at the FDAs University of Mississippi cannabis Cultivation facility (see my articles and posts on the subject, it's deeply interesting) to create the ultimate Indica Pure Strain.
The other popular rumor is that a soldier brought the seed back from Afghanistan or Vietnam, I can't remember which but both stories seem legitimate when one considers the stoner nomenclature. So G13 is a landrace Hybrid Indica pure Hybrid Genetic.
Lemon Gs other contribution is Early Misty. And in this we have the simplicity in proximity to landrace / Plethora of Landrace in Simplicity phenomena (p¹). The second phenomena I will call the Characteristic Opposition of strain presentation phenomena (p²), meaning the opposite characteristics of that lean are presenting on the profile, be that presence of the opposite characteristics or diminishment of the leans actual characteristics. So this can be like our Blue Dream go to example of A sativa lean with Beta Caryophyllene sedating quality or as an example.of diminishment we have the lack of.CBG or lowered linalool content in Popscotti.
Lemon G is an easily seen example of simplicity in proximity / plethora of Landrace simplicity phenomena. So we have an immediate throw back to sativa landrace expression in Early Misty's Parent genetics.
After this we see Early Skunk, which is also a blend of landrace genetics immediately. Early Skunk is Early Girl x Pollyanna which both trace immediately back to hybrid landrace in Early Girl and South American Sativa Landrace in Pollyanna. Both representing the simplicity of Proximity to Landrace phenomena & plethora of Landrace in Simplicity phenomena extremely well (both types of Phenomena 1 in pinene formula Terpological protocol.)
Even Skunk No.1 is a proximity to simplicity phenomena example. Skunk No. 1 is literally a cross of 3 Landrace genetics. I wouldn't consider this plethora of.lamdrace in simplicity as were only dealing with 3 genetic profiles, all landrace. Ergo it is exemplary of simplicity of Proximity to Landrace phenomena.
Then when we back up to the genetics of Popscotti, Which are the contributing genetics.of Biscotti & Red Pop we get back to Tahoe Alien. Once again we have an epitomized example of Simplicity of proximity to Landrace phenomena.
Stay tuned for the next review. . . .
COLLAB 13 is up next.
Advoc8 always
Meduc8 Daily
Dont break the law while your breaking the law.
References
Red Pop Information on Genetic Lineage
Topical Application of Beta Myrcene Aids Arthritis Relief
Red Pop on All Bud, Description of Strain
Nociception In Mice - Cannabis
Analgesia & Anti Inflammatory Properties
Harvard Studies on CB1 Cb2 Receptor activity
